ASICS Gel Excite 11 vs Kayano 31: Which Running Shoe Is Right for You?

Are you stuck between the ASICS Gel Excite 11 and the Kayano 31? You are not alone. These two running shoes come from the same brand, but they serve very different runners. One costs under $100 and targets beginners.

The other is a premium stability shoe built for serious long distance comfort. The price gap is huge. The feature gap is even bigger. But does that always mean the expensive option wins? Not always.

This guide breaks down every difference between the Gel Excite 11 and the Kayano 31. You will learn about cushioning, stability, weight, durability, breathability, and price. By the end, you will know exactly which shoe fits your running life. Let’s get into it.

Key Takeaways

• The ASICS Gel Excite 11 costs around $90, while the Kayano 31 retails near $160. This price difference is the first thing most runners notice. The Excite 11 delivers solid value for casual runners and beginners on a budget.
• The Kayano 31 uses FF Blast+ ECO foam and PureGEL technology in its midsole. This gives it a softer, more plush ride. The Excite 11 uses Amplifoam+ Plus, which feels firmer underfoot and offers less bounce.
• Stability is a clear win for the Kayano 31. It features a 4D Guidance System, wider midsole platform, and higher torsional rigidity. The Excite 11 has decent stability for a neutral shoe but lacks dedicated pronation control.
• The Excite 11 weighs 10.1 oz (286g) and the Kayano 31 weighs 10.4 oz (295g). The difference is small, but the Kayano carries its weight in more premium materials and denser foam.
• Breathability favors the Kayano 31 with a 4/5 rating compared to the Excite 11’s 2/5. Runners in warm climates will feel this difference during summer runs.
• Both shoes suit heel strikers with high heel to toe drops. The Excite 11 measures 10.8 mm and the Kayano 31 measures 11.5 mm. Midfoot and forefoot strikers should look elsewhere.

ASICS Gel Excite 11 Overview

Last update on 2026-06-09 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

The ASICS Gel Excite 11 is a budget friendly daily trainer priced at $90. It targets beginners, casual joggers, and gym goers who want a reliable shoe without a premium price tag. ASICS updated this version with a higher stack height of 38.2 mm in the heel, which is impressive for a shoe under $100.

The midsole uses Amplifoam+ Plus technology paired with a thin GEL unit in the heel. This combo provides decent shock absorption but does not deliver much energy return. The ride feels stable and firm rather than bouncy or springy.

ASICS kept the outsole strong on this model. Traction scored 0.71 in lab tests, which is above average for any running shoe. The heel counter is also very stiff, earning a 5/5 rating. This makes the Excite 11 a good pick for runners who want a locked in heel feel.

Pros:

• Very affordable at $90 retail price
• High stack height for extra cushioning
• Strong traction and outsole durability
• Stiff heel counter for secure fit
• Works well for walking and light running

Cons:

• Low energy return at 49.2%
• Poor breathability rated 2/5
• Heavier than average at 10.1 oz
• Weak toebox durability rated 1/5
• No reflective elements for night running

ASICS Gel Kayano 31 Overview

Last update on 2026-09-13 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

The ASICS Gel Kayano 31 is a premium stability running shoe that retails around $160. It is built for runners who need support, cushioning, and long lasting comfort on daily training runs. This shoe has been a favorite among overpronators for over 30 years.

The midsole features FF Blast+ ECO foam combined with PureGEL technology in the heel. This setup creates a soft, plush landing that protects joints during longer runs. The 4D Guidance System provides adaptive stability that gently corrects overpronation.

The Kayano 31 also shines in traction with a lab tested score of 0.83, one of the highest scores ever recorded. The breathable engineered mesh upper earned a 4/5 rating. The semi gusseted tongue and finger loop heel tab add to the premium feel.

Pros:

• Outstanding traction score of 0.83
• Soft FF Blast+ ECO midsole foam
• 4D Guidance System for stability
• Good breathability rated 4/5
• Strong toebox durability rated 4/5

Cons:

• High retail price around $160
• Heavy at 10.4 oz (295g)
• Low energy return at 49.2%
• Midsole gets 26% firmer in cold weather
• Not ideal for forefoot strikers

Cushioning Comparison

Cushioning is one of the biggest differences between these two shoes. The Kayano 31 measured 131 SA in heel shock absorption during lab tests. The Excite 11 measured 123 SA in the same test. Both scores sit close to the average of 130 SA, but the Kayano pulls ahead.

The midsole foam tells the real story. The Kayano 31 uses FF Blast+ ECO, which tested at 35.3 AC on the durometer. The Excite 11 uses Amplifoam+ Plus, which measured 40.5 AC. Lower numbers mean softer foam. The Kayano feels noticeably plusher underfoot.

Both shoes share an identical energy return of 49.2%, which falls below the 58.6% average. Neither shoe will feel springy or bouncy. They focus on comfort and protection instead of propulsion. Runners who want a responsive bounce should consider other options.

Stability Features

The Kayano 31 is a dedicated stability shoe. It uses the 4D Guidance System to correct overpronation in a subtle way. This system sits inside the midsole and adjusts to your foot strike pattern. The Excite 11 is a neutral trainer without any dedicated pronation control.

The Kayano 31 has a forefoot midsole width of 122.1 mm compared to the Excite 11’s 117.5 mm. In the heel, the Kayano measures 97.6 mm while the Excite 11 reaches 100.2 mm. Both shoes use wide platforms, but the Kayano distributes its width more evenly.

Torsional rigidity also differs. The Kayano 31 earned a 4/5 rating and resists twisting very well. The Excite 11 measured 17.0 Nm, which is above average but lacks the same level of anti twist resistance. Runners with pronation issues should pick the Kayano 31.

Midsole Technology Breakdown

The Kayano 31 stacks premium technology in its midsole. FF Blast+ ECO is an EVA and OBC blend foam that offers soft cushioning. PureGEL sits inside the heel and is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology. These two layers work together for smooth landings.

The Excite 11 keeps things simple. Its Amplifoam+ Plus midsole is a basic EVA compound. ASICS includes a thin GEL unit in the heel, but lab tests show it is barely noticeable during runs. The foam does its job for short runs and casual use.

The heel stack heights are similar. The Kayano 31 measures 39.3 mm and the Excite 11 measures 38.2 mm. Both shoes offer generous foam volume. The difference is in foam quality. The Kayano uses a lighter, softer, more responsive material that justifies the higher price.

Weight and Build Quality

The ASICS Gel Excite 11 weighs 10.1 oz (286g) in a men’s US size 9. The Kayano 31 comes in slightly heavier at 10.4 oz (295g). That is only a 9 gram difference. Most runners will not feel this gap during a run.

Build quality is where the separation grows. The Kayano 31 uses engineered mesh with a secondary support layer that holds up well over time. The Excite 11 uses a jacquard mesh that looks nice but scored just 1/5 in toebox durability tests. The Kayano scored 4/5 in the same test.

The Kayano 31 includes extras like a semi gusseted tongue, finger loop heel tab, and reflective elements. The Excite 11 has none of these features. These details may seem small, but they add up during daily use and longer runs.

Breathability and Upper Design

The Kayano 31 earned a 4/5 breathability score in smoke machine tests. Its engineered mesh features visible ventilation holes in the toebox area. A secondary layer sits underneath for structure, which slightly limits full airflow. It still works great in warm weather.

The Excite 11 scored just 2/5 for breathability. Its jacquard mesh has narrow gaps that look breathable on the surface. But a thick inner liner blocks most airflow. Under a microscope, the material shows limited space for air to pass through. Hot climate runners will notice this.

However, the Excite 11 performs better in cold weather. Its midsole only gets 14% firmer in freezing temperatures compared to the Kayano’s 25.6%. The low breathability also keeps feet warmer. So if you run in cold climates, the Excite 11 may actually work in your favor.

Traction and Outsole Durability

Both shoes deliver excellent grip on road surfaces. The Kayano 31 scored an incredible 0.83 in forefoot traction tests. This places it among the highest scoring shoes ever tested. The Excite 11 scored 0.71, which is also well above the 0.50 average.

Outsole durability tells a different story. The Excite 11 showed 0.9 mm of wear in Dremel tests, while the Kayano 31 lost 1.1 mm. The Excite 11 actually has a slightly more durable outsole by this measurement. Its outsole rubber is thinner at 2.8 mm compared to the Kayano’s 4.0 mm.

Both shoes should last between 300 and 500 miles for most runners. The Kayano 31 may last longer because its upper and internal materials hold shape better over time. The Excite 11’s weaker toebox could show wear earlier with heavy use.

Fit and Sizing

The ASICS Gel Excite 11 fits slightly small according to user votes. Many runners recommend going up a half size. The toebox measures 71.2 mm wide, which is narrower than average. Runners with wide feet may feel some tightness up front.

The Kayano 31 fits true to size based on 269 user votes. Its toebox is wider at 74.8 mm and the overall width reaches 98.9 mm at the broadest point. This makes it a better fit for runners with wider feet or those who prefer extra room.

Both shoes are available in wide versions for runners who need more space. The Kayano 31 offers a more accommodating fit out of the box. The Excite 11 works fine for runners with average or narrow feet who order their standard ASICS size.

Drop and Ride Feel

The heel to toe drop is high on both shoes. The Excite 11 measures 10.8 mm and the Kayano 31 measures 11.5 mm. Both numbers are above the 8.6 mm average. These shoes are built for heel strikers who want a smooth transition from landing to toe off.

The ride feel is quite different. The Kayano 31 provides a plush, cushioned roll through each stride. The midsole absorbs impact and guides the foot forward. The Excite 11 feels firmer and more flat. It does not have the same smooth transition quality.

Neither shoe uses a rocker design. The Kayano 31 has a nearly flat profile from heel to forefoot. The Excite 11 has a slightly lifted toe spring to help propulsion. Both shoes feel best at easy to moderate paces rather than fast tempo runs.

Price and Value Comparison

The ASICS Gel Excite 11 retails at $90. The Kayano 31 retails at approximately $160. That is a $70 difference. The question is whether the Kayano’s premium features justify the extra cost for your specific needs.

For beginner runners, casual joggers, and gym users, the Excite 11 offers strong value. It provides decent cushioning, reliable traction, and a stable platform. You get a solid running shoe at a very competitive price point.

For dedicated runners who log serious miles, the Kayano 31 is worth the investment. Its softer foam, better breathability, superior durability, and stability technology make it a stronger choice for long term use. The cost per mile drops significantly with regular training.

Who Should Buy the Gel Excite 11

The ASICS Gel Excite 11 is ideal for beginner runners who need a first pair of running shoes. It provides enough cushioning and stability for short to moderate runs. The low price makes it easy to try running without a big financial commitment.

Gym goers and casual walkers also benefit from this shoe. Its firm midsole works well for treadmill sessions and light fitness classes. The wide heel base adds stability during lateral movements. Many users report it works great as an everyday comfort shoe.

Budget focused runners who need a reliable daily trainer will appreciate the Excite 11. It handles 3 to 5 mile runs without issues. Just keep in mind that the weak toebox durability and low breathability may limit its lifespan for heavy use.

Who Should Buy the Kayano 31

The Kayano 31 is built for runners who overpronate and need structured support. The 4D Guidance System corrects foot roll without feeling intrusive. Runners who have experienced knee pain or ankle instability from neutral shoes should consider this model.

Long distance runners benefit most from the Kayano 31’s cushioning system. The FF Blast+ ECO foam and PureGEL technology protect joints over many miles. Marathon trainers use it for easy runs and recovery days because of its comfortable, supportive ride.

Heavier runners also find the Kayano 31 effective. The 131 SA shock absorption and wide midsole platform distribute impact forces well. If you weigh over 180 pounds and run regularly, this shoe offers the protection your body needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the ASICS Gel Excite 11 good for long distance running?

The Excite 11 works best for short to moderate runs up to 5 miles. It lacks the premium cushioning and energy return needed for half marathon or marathon distances. The Kayano 31 is a much better choice for longer runs due to its softer foam and greater shock absorption.

Can I use the Kayano 31 if I have a neutral gait?

Yes, you can. The Kayano 31’s stability features are subtle and non intrusive. Many neutral runners enjoy its plush cushioning without feeling forced into a corrected stride. However, you may find lighter neutral shoes like the ASICS Gel Nimbus more suitable.

How long do the ASICS Gel Excite 11 and Kayano 31 last?

The Excite 11 typically lasts 300 to 400 miles. The Kayano 31 can reach 400 to 500 miles thanks to its stronger upper and thicker outsole. Your mileage will vary based on running surface, body weight, and running form.

Are these shoes good for walking?

Both shoes work well for walking. The Excite 11 is a popular choice among walkers because of its affordable price and firm, stable ride. The Kayano 31 offers more cushioning for walkers who spend long hours on their feet.

Which shoe is better for flat feet?

The Kayano 31 is the better option for flat feet. Its 4D Guidance System and wide stability platform provide arch support and pronation control. The Excite 11 lacks dedicated stability features for runners with flat arches.

Do I need to size up for the ASICS Gel Excite 11?

Many runners report the Excite 11 fits slightly small. Going up a half size is a common recommendation. The Kayano 31 fits true to size for most runners and offers a wider toebox for additional comfort.